Key Rating Drivers & Detailed Description
Strengths:
Established market position in the microfinance space, additionally benefiting from its bank status which allows diversification and scalability
Ujjivan SFB, the third largest small finance bank in the country, benefits from its strong presence and longstanding track record of 18 years in the microfinance space in India. Of the total portfolio, 67% constituted micro-banking loans, which corresponded to a market share of close to 4% in the microfinance space in India. Within this, group loans under JLG model were 55% (of the AUM) whereas balance were individual loans to microfinance borrowers with long association history with the bank.
For fiscal 2021, the growth in micro-banking portfolio was constrained due to the pandemic and following disruptions. This momentum was again impacted by the second wave resulting in a muted Q1 2022. However, a faster relaxation in lockdown thereafter and pent up demand for credit resulted in a steep increase in disbursements in Q2 and Q3 2022, yielding a nine monthly growth of 9% in AUM which stood at Rs 16463 crore as on December 31, 2021.
Considering almost two third of the bank’s portfolio comprises microfinance loans (group loans, individual loans and agriculture loans) which is susceptible to socio-economic adversities, the bank has been strategically reducing exposure to this segment so as to curtail it at 50% levels in the long run.
The presence of Ujjivan SFB in the microfinance space is geographically well diversified. In its portfolio, no state accounts for more than 16% of the total loan book, which has been a positive aspect for portfolio quality. With respect to pockets of Assam, West Bengal, Maharashtra, Punjab and Tamil Nadu (around 42% exposure) which have exhibited weaker asset quality performance than other states over the last 4-8 quarters, improvement has happened in the last 4-5 months of calendar year 2021. However, as far as incremental growth in these states is concerned, the bank remains watchful and is expected to refrain from increasing its micro loans exposure therein for some time
Presence in the microfinance institution space helps expansion of portfolio in adjacencies, such as micro and small enterprise loans and housing finance. Moreover, exposure to political and regulatory uncertainties associated with the microfinance sector would diminish gradually as the bank increases its scale in the non-microfinance business wherein the target customers are relatively more affluent.
As on December 31, 2021, aside from 67% of micro banking portfolio, 16% of the AUM comprised housing loans followed by SME loans accounting for 10%.
Financial risk profile remains strong supported by adequate capitalization, though profitability, which has moderated due to additional provisioning, remains a monitorable.
Ujjivan’s capital position is adequate reflected in a tier I and overall capital adequacy ratio of 17.7% and 19.1%, respectively, on December 31, 2021. Networth as on the same date was reported to be Rs 2,674 crore.
In the aftermath of the pandemic as asset quality deteriorated sharply, credit costs surged in addition to increased interest reversals. Resultantly, the bank’s operating and overall profitability both moderated and have remained modest ever since.
As against a net profit of Rs 350 crore and a RoMA of 2.2% for fiscal 2020, the bank reported a muted profit of Rs 8 crore and a RoMA of 0.04% for fiscal 2021. Credit costs for the year surged to 4.1% from 1.1% for the previous year. Due to legacy slippages after the first pandemic wave and additional impact of the second one, the bank reported a loss for each of the first three quarters of fiscal 2022 resulting in a cumulative nine monthly loss of Rs 541 crore as against a loss of Rs 128 crore for the corresponding period of the previous fiscal. RoMA for these periods were -3.5% and -0.9%, respectively. Credit cost for 9M 2022 was 5.9% as against 5.5% for 9M 2021.
Apart from high credit costs, net interest margins also thinned due to high reversals resulting in a low pre-provisioning profit of Rs 373 crore for 9M 2022 as compared to Rs 651 crore for 9M 2021.
However, the bank follows an advance provisioning policy which allows it to maintain a higher than peer provisioning coverage ratio. Over the last 4-6 quarters, the bank’s average PCR for the last 6 quarters was 76%.
Considering the gradual turn around in the last quarter reflected in increased recoveries and expanding NIMs, Ujjivan SFB’s operating and overall profitability is expected to restore gradually in the normal course of business, only over the medium to long term.
Sound risk management systems and processes
Ujjivan SFB continues to have an independent credit vertical for sanctioning loans. The credit team also administers ground-level processes followed by the sales team. Credit bureau verification and internal deduplication are conducted centrally. Ujjivan has a strong independent internal control and audit function for conducting frequent audits of its branches. It has implemented technology solutions for managing liabilities and other banking functions such as treasury, risk management, and compliance. Its systems and processes should enable the bank to revive asset quality in the microfinance business to pre-Covid levels, over the near to medium term. However, ability to replicate sound systems and processes for small and micro enterprise loan, home loan, and home improvement loan segments as they scale, is to be demonstrated.
Weakness:
Asset quality remains vulnerable despite early signs of improvement, traction in collection and recovery will be a key monitorable
The bank’s asset quality has remained volatile since the outbreak of the pandemic in March 2020. Its gross NPAs, which have historically remained within 2% in the normal course of business, elevated sharply after culmination of moratoria in September 2020 and peaked at 11.8% as of September 30, 2021. Net NPA as on September 30, 2021 stood at 3.3% whereas total stressed assets (including NPAs, restructured portfolio and write offs in H1 2022) were high at 22%.
Given 94% of the company’s portfolio comprised microfinance, housing loans and SME loans as of March 2020, the disruption in salary income and cash inflows of the borrowers in these segments hindered their repayment capacity. After the first wave, overall monthly collections dipped to as low as 5% in April 2020 followed by revival to 105% in January 2021 (including foreclosures/ advance payments) – driven by increased overdue collections.
After the second wave, collection efficiency (including over dues, excluding advance collections) dipped to 71% in May 2021 however, as the macro situation restored and lockdown restrictions were relaxed, it improved to 95% in September 2021 and further to 97% in January 2022. Improvement in resolution across buckets resulted in a marginal reduction in NPAs to 9.8% (gross) and 1.7% (net) as of December 31, 2021. As on this date, total stressed assets accounted for 18% of the AUM.
Since March 2020, the bank’s provisioning coverage ratio on NPAs has consistently remained >70% (except on March 31, 2021) and stood at 84% as on December 31, 2021. As of this date, the bank was carrying Rs 1549 crore as provisions which formed 9.4% of its AUM. While gradual improvement in asset quality of the bank has commenced in Q3 2022, the ability of the bank to expedite this improvement so as to revive its muted profitability remains a key rating sensitivity factor. In addition, given the bank’s target market has a major composition of customers with below average credit risk profile, the ability to reinstate credit discipline within this segment will remain critical.
Lower than peer, though increasing CASA and retail deposit base
While the share of retail deposits (CASA and retail term deposits of ticket size < Rs 2 crore) has been gradually increasing, it still remains relatively smaller than other banks, at 60.6% of total deposits as on December 31, 2021. CASA, though higher than its earlier positions, remains lower than banking peers at 26.5%. The proportion of institutional deposits has declined to 37.0% as of December 31, 2021 from 41.8%, a year ago. Though, majority of reduction has happened over Q2, Q3 of fiscal 2022 and sustenance in this is yet to be demonstrated.
The bank's focus on mobilization of deposits increased fiscal 2019 onwards since most of fiscal 2018, after its banking transition, was spent in overcoming demonetization related challenges apart from completing the process of transformation to banking platform. This led to a lagged pick up in the deposit franchise and thus, the base of retail deposits including CASA, is low.
Initially, the bank’s reliance was largely on shorter tenure bulk products like CDs and institutional deposits. However, as banking operations stabilized and efforts were made establish the liability franchise, the share of bulk/ wholesale deposits reduced from 89.4% in December 2017 to merely 37% now. The benefit of this transition is also reflective in the declining cost of funds which were at 6.16% in Q3 2022 as compared to 7.14% for the corresponding quarter of the previous fiscal. Simultaneously, the bank has also replaced its short term deposits with longer tenure ones thereby strengthening its ALM in the process.
Modest credit risk profile of borrowers
A significant portion of the portfolio comprises microfinance loans to clients with below-average credit risk profiles and lack of access to formal credit. For instance, in the individual loan and micro and small enterprise loans, typical borrowers are vegetable vendors, small machine and lathe owners, tea shops, provision stores, small fabrication units, waste paper recycling units, tailors, and power looms. These customers belong to the semi-skilled self-employed category, and their income flow could be volatile and dependent on the local economy. With the slowdown in economic activity after the lockdown, the cash flows for such borrowers have been stretched, thereby restricting their repayment capability. The bank has identified the more impacted customers from this segment and restructured their loans in the third quarter of fiscal 2021.
At an overall level, while collections have picked up since June 2020, the revival to pre-pandemic level is some distance away, and Ujjivan SFB’s ability to reinstate repayment discipline among its customers will be a monitorable.